<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sidewiki Blockers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/</link>
	<description>Rants, Ideas, and Internet Marketing&#039;s Sounding Board</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Blocking Google Sidewiki</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/comment-page-1/#comment-4508</link>
		<dc:creator>Blocking Google Sidewiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=767#comment-4508</guid>
		<description>[...] Sidewiki blockers for other types of sites can be found on Sylvie&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sidewiki blockers for other types of sites can be found on Sylvie&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Is Google&#8217;s &#8216;Sidewiki&#8217;? and the Controversy</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/comment-page-1/#comment-4500</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is Google&#8217;s &#8216;Sidewiki&#8217;? and the Controversy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=767#comment-4500</guid>
		<description>[...] for you, and you (with others) the ability to vote or rate  comments.  There are also some &#8216;blockers&#8216; being built that exploit the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for you, and you (with others) the ability to vote or rate  comments.  There are also some &#8216;blockers&#8216; being built that exploit the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AchieveMaster</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/comment-page-1/#comment-4525</link>
		<dc:creator>AchieveMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=767#comment-4525</guid>
		<description>I am working on a rewrite of the Ultimate side-wiki Blocker that uses the htaccess to detect when a site has the side-wiki toolbar installed and only uses the url hash in that case.  This will make the URL even more friendly. Also, a small little post could be popped up optionally to tell the user why SW is being blocked - which could then inform the user about side-wiki and that there are other tool bars they could be using (including the fact that Google is still offering the toolbar without side-wiki).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ultimately the best solution would be to detect side-wiki, and then suck in the content, filter it according to rules set up by the site user, and then display it without the &quot;evil comments&quot;.  That gets into a whole other area however - as most users would balk at their content being tampered with.  This is definitely a can-of-worms scenario.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David T. McKee&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS: Sorry about the double post before, my browser hiccuped in the middle of posting the original and I thought it did not make it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am working on a rewrite of the Ultimate side-wiki Blocker that uses the htaccess to detect when a site has the side-wiki toolbar installed and only uses the url hash in that case.  This will make the URL even more friendly. Also, a small little post could be popped up optionally to tell the user why SW is being blocked &#8211; which could then inform the user about side-wiki and that there are other tool bars they could be using (including the fact that Google is still offering the toolbar without side-wiki).</p>
<p>Ultimately the best solution would be to detect side-wiki, and then suck in the content, filter it according to rules set up by the site user, and then display it without the &#8220;evil comments&#8221;.  That gets into a whole other area however &#8211; as most users would balk at their content being tampered with.  This is definitely a can-of-worms scenario.</p>
<p>David T. McKee</p>
<p>PS: Sorry about the double post before, my browser hiccuped in the middle of posting the original and I thought it did not make it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvie Fortin</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/comment-page-1/#comment-4524</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvie Fortin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=767#comment-4524</guid>
		<description>Not sure what a &quot;normal website owner&quot; is defined as (I think I&#039;m pretty normal). :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But my problem with all of this is that all website owners lose the ability to manage the comments appearing that are directly related to (beside) their own websites, and that&#039;s where blockers may become a necessity. For us, we haven&#039;t yet decided to implement a blocker, as we&#039;re in a &quot;wait and see&quot; mode. But we won&#039;t hesitate to do it if it becomes necessary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note that even the blockers won&#039;t stop Sidewiki comments from happening, and they will still be searchable (indexed by Google), but that, at least, would be located on Google&#039;s domain, not appearing next to my own while a customer is browsing my website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what a &#8220;normal website owner&#8221; is defined as (I think I&#39;m pretty normal). <img src='http://marketersboard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But my problem with all of this is that all website owners lose the ability to manage the comments appearing that are directly related to (beside) their own websites, and that&#39;s where blockers may become a necessity. For us, we haven&#39;t yet decided to implement a blocker, as we&#39;re in a &#8220;wait and see&#8221; mode. But we won&#39;t hesitate to do it if it becomes necessary.</p>
<p>Note that even the blockers won&#39;t stop Sidewiki comments from happening, and they will still be searchable (indexed by Google), but that, at least, would be located on Google&#39;s domain, not appearing next to my own while a customer is browsing my website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewa</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/comment-page-1/#comment-4523</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=767#comment-4523</guid>
		<description>I  hope the Sideviki is dangerous only for the user of this  Google&#039;s tool. otherwise it is a total attack for all webside owners and bloggers. &lt;br&gt;Is it neceassy for a normal web side owner to use the blockers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  hope the Sideviki is dangerous only for the user of this  Google&#39;s tool. otherwise it is a total attack for all webside owners and bloggers. <br />Is it neceassy for a normal web side owner to use the blockers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AchieveMaster</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/comment-page-1/#comment-4491</link>
		<dc:creator>AchieveMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=767#comment-4491</guid>
		<description>I am working on a rewrite of the Ultimate side-wiki Blocker that uses the htaccess to detect when a site has the side-wiki toolbar installed and only uses the url hash in that case.  This will make the URL even more friendly. Also, a small little post could be popped up optionally to tell the user why SW is being blocked - which could then inform the user about side-wiki and that there are other tool bars they could be using (including the fact that Google is still offering the toolbar without side-wiki).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ultimately the best solution would be to detect side-wiki, and then suck in the content, filter it according to rules set up by the site user, and then display it without the &quot;evil comments&quot;.  That gets into a whole other area however - as most users would balk at their content being tampered with.  This is definitely a can-of-worms scenario.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David T. McKee&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS: Sorry about the double post before, my browser hiccuped in the middle of posting the original and I thought it did not make it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am working on a rewrite of the Ultimate side-wiki Blocker that uses the htaccess to detect when a site has the side-wiki toolbar installed and only uses the url hash in that case.  This will make the URL even more friendly. Also, a small little post could be popped up optionally to tell the user why SW is being blocked &#8211; which could then inform the user about side-wiki and that there are other tool bars they could be using (including the fact that Google is still offering the toolbar without side-wiki).</p>
<p>Ultimately the best solution would be to detect side-wiki, and then suck in the content, filter it according to rules set up by the site user, and then display it without the &#8220;evil comments&#8221;.  That gets into a whole other area however &#8211; as most users would balk at their content being tampered with.  This is definitely a can-of-worms scenario.</p>
<p>David T. McKee</p>
<p>PS: Sorry about the double post before, my browser hiccuped in the middle of posting the original and I thought it did not make it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvie Fortin</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/comment-page-1/#comment-4482</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvie Fortin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=767#comment-4482</guid>
		<description>Not sure what a &quot;normal website owner&quot; is defined as (I think I&#039;m pretty normal). :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But my problem with all of this is that all website owners lose the ability to manage the comments appearing that are directly related to (beside) their own websites, and that&#039;s where blockers may become a necessity. For us, we haven&#039;t yet decided to implement a blocker, as we&#039;re in a &quot;wait and see&quot; mode. But we won&#039;t hesitate to do it if it becomes necessary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Note that even the blockers won&#039;t stop Sidewiki comments from happening, and they will still be searchable (indexed by Google), but that, at least, would be located on Google&#039;s domain, not appearing next to my own while a customer is browsing my website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what a &#8220;normal website owner&#8221; is defined as (I think I&#39;m pretty normal). <img src='http://marketersboard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But my problem with all of this is that all website owners lose the ability to manage the comments appearing that are directly related to (beside) their own websites, and that&#39;s where blockers may become a necessity. For us, we haven&#39;t yet decided to implement a blocker, as we&#39;re in a &#8220;wait and see&#8221; mode. But we won&#39;t hesitate to do it if it becomes necessary.</p>
<p>Note that even the blockers won&#39;t stop Sidewiki comments from happening, and they will still be searchable (indexed by Google), but that, at least, would be located on Google&#39;s domain, not appearing next to my own while a customer is browsing my website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewa</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/comment-page-1/#comment-4481</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=767#comment-4481</guid>
		<description>I  hope the Sideviki is dangerous only for the user of this  Google&#039;s tool. otherwise it is a total attack for all webside owners and bloggers. &lt;br&gt;Is it neceassy for a normal web side owner to use the blockers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  hope the Sideviki is dangerous only for the user of this  Google&#39;s tool. otherwise it is a total attack for all webside owners and bloggers. <br />Is it neceassy for a normal web side owner to use the blockers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AchieveMaster</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/comment-page-1/#comment-4445</link>
		<dc:creator>AchieveMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=767#comment-4445</guid>
		<description>Here is the sidewiki blocker I wrote for both static HTML pages and wordpress as a plugin (you get both) &quot;&quot;The Ultimate Sidewiki Blocker&quot;.  It has both true randomization of the hash code using the date, true letter and number randomization, and allows you to optionally add a identifier key to the from of your has (no other blocker does this) so you know it is your code running.  The has ends up looking like this:  .../#fortin_8jd754hjdif843hed93h  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, it is absolutely free!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/UltimateSideWikiBlocker.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/Ultima...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David T. McKee&lt;br&gt;&quot;The Master Achiever&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the sidewiki blocker I wrote for both static HTML pages and wordpress as a plugin (you get both) &#8220;&#8221;The Ultimate Sidewiki Blocker&#8221;.  It has both true randomization of the hash code using the date, true letter and number randomization, and allows you to optionally add a identifier key to the from of your has (no other blocker does this) so you know it is your code running.  The has ends up looking like this:  &#8230;/#fortin_8jd754hjdif843hed93h  </p>
<p>Also, it is absolutely free!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/UltimateSideWikiBlocker.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/Ultima" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/Ultima'>http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/Ultima</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>David T. McKee<br />&#8220;The Master Achiever&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AchieveMaster</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-sidewiki-blockers/comment-page-1/#comment-4444</link>
		<dc:creator>AchieveMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=767#comment-4444</guid>
		<description>I wanted to add to your list.  After finding out about the Sidewiki issue on the Warrior Forum, I create &quot;The Ultimate Sidewiki Blocker&quot; which incorporates true randomization plus the ability to add a keyword into the hash key so that you know it is your blocker doing the blocking.  No other blocker has this (yet).  I include both a standard script for static pages plus a wordpress plugin and it is all free!&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/UltimateSideWikiBlocker.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/Ultima...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David T. McKee&lt;br&gt;The Master Achiever</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to add to your list.  After finding out about the Sidewiki issue on the Warrior Forum, I create &#8220;The Ultimate Sidewiki Blocker&#8221; which incorporates true randomization plus the ability to add a keyword into the hash key so that you know it is your blocker doing the blocking.  No other blocker has this (yet).  I include both a standard script for static pages plus a wordpress plugin and it is all free!<br /><a href="http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/UltimateSideWikiBlocker.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/Ultima" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/Ultima'>http://www.achievemaster.com/landing/USB/Ultima</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>David T. McKee<br />The Master Achiever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

