<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google Search Wiki Worth a Look?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketersboard.com/google-search-wiki-worth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-search-wiki-worth/</link>
	<description>Rants, Ideas, and Internet Marketing&#039;s Sounding Board</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Ratliff</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-search-wiki-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Ratliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=146#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Sylvie,

Socially directed search...what a novel concept.  Let every person determine for themselves what&#039;s relevant to them and what&#039;s not...and set ads (read: Adwords) on the page according to that search...hmmm

And thanks Sylvie...I am glad to be here. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sylvie,</p>
<p>Socially directed search&#8230;what a novel concept.  Let every person determine for themselves what&#8217;s relevant to them and what&#8217;s not&#8230;and set ads (read: Adwords) on the page according to that search&#8230;hmmm</p>
<p>And thanks Sylvie&#8230;I am glad to be here. <img src='http://marketersboard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Ratliff</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-search-wiki-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-4554</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Ratliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=146#comment-4554</guid>
		<description>Sylvie,

Socially directed search...what a novel concept.  Let every person determine for themselves what&#039;s relevant to them and what&#039;s not...and set ads (read: Adwords) on the page according to that search...hmmm

And thanks Sylvie...I am glad to be here. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sylvie,</p>
<p>Socially directed search&#8230;what a novel concept.  Let every person determine for themselves what&#8217;s relevant to them and what&#8217;s not&#8230;and set ads (read: Adwords) on the page according to that search&#8230;hmmm</p>
<p>And thanks Sylvie&#8230;I am glad to be here. <img src='http://marketersboard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvie Fortin</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-search-wiki-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvie Fortin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=146#comment-112</guid>
		<description>hey Joseph! Great to see you here. :)

Yes, that&#039;s exactly what I think. I think Google is paying close attention to how people use the net, and this is their early test in social &quot;voting&quot; on search results.

It will be cool to see how it all pans out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Joseph! Great to see you here. <img src='http://marketersboard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s exactly what I think. I think Google is paying close attention to how people use the net, and this is their early test in social &#8220;voting&#8221; on search results.</p>
<p>It will be cool to see how it all pans out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvie Fortin</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-search-wiki-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-4553</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvie Fortin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=146#comment-4553</guid>
		<description>hey Joseph! Great to see you here. :)

Yes, that&#039;s exactly what I think. I think Google is paying close attention to how people use the net, and this is their early test in social &quot;voting&quot; on search results.

It will be cool to see how it all pans out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Joseph! Great to see you here. <img src='http://marketersboard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s exactly what I think. I think Google is paying close attention to how people use the net, and this is their early test in social &#8220;voting&#8221; on search results.</p>
<p>It will be cool to see how it all pans out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki Zerbee</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-search-wiki-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Zerbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=146#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Hey guys.. thanks so much for this info.  I can&#039;t wait to check it out.  And bookmarking your new blog as it looks like it is going to be a great new resource.  Happy New Year.. much happiness, health and success to you in 2009!

Vicki</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys.. thanks so much for this info.  I can&#8217;t wait to check it out.  And bookmarking your new blog as it looks like it is going to be a great new resource.  Happy New Year.. much happiness, health and success to you in 2009!</p>
<p>Vicki</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki Zerbee</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-search-wiki-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-4552</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Zerbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=146#comment-4552</guid>
		<description>Hey guys.. thanks so much for this info.  I can&#039;t wait to check it out.  And bookmarking your new blog as it looks like it is going to be a great new resource.  Happy New Year.. much happiness, health and success to you in 2009!

Vicki</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys.. thanks so much for this info.  I can&#8217;t wait to check it out.  And bookmarking your new blog as it looks like it is going to be a great new resource.  Happy New Year.. much happiness, health and success to you in 2009!</p>
<p>Vicki</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Ratliff</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-search-wiki-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Ratliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=146#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Great job on the site Sylvie and Michel. :)

Could this be Google&#039;s way of split testing &quot;social search&quot; vs. &quot;algorithm search&quot;  ???

Hmmm....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job on the site Sylvie and Michel. <img src='http://marketersboard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Could this be Google&#8217;s way of split testing &#8220;social search&#8221; vs. &#8220;algorithm search&#8221;  ???</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Ratliff</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-search-wiki-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-4551</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Ratliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=146#comment-4551</guid>
		<description>Great job on the site Sylvie and Michel. :)

Could this be Google&#039;s way of split testing &quot;social search&quot; vs. &quot;algorithm search&quot;  ???

Hmmm....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job on the site Sylvie and Michel. <img src='http://marketersboard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Could this be Google&#8217;s way of split testing &#8220;social search&#8221; vs. &#8220;algorithm search&#8221;  ???</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. A. Manley</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-search-wiki-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. A. Manley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=146#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sylvie. Great video review. Never even heard of this.

I could see this being valuable in the case of where one has a loyal following. For example, one of my alt. health clients has a big following loyal readers who keep up with his daily blog posts. I think he could just go ahead and ask them to log into Google,  promote his site and a leave a favorable comment.

Sure, he could &quot;bribe&quot; them with an offer. But that sort of takes away from it being an voluntary review. Sounds like paying people -- and would deserve a Google Slap, imo. I think it makes more sense to just constantly give a lot, so that when you ask for a favour like this, the readers (or listeners or viewers -- depending on your medium) are happy to respond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sylvie. Great video review. Never even heard of this.</p>
<p>I could see this being valuable in the case of where one has a loyal following. For example, one of my alt. health clients has a big following loyal readers who keep up with his daily blog posts. I think he could just go ahead and ask them to log into Google,  promote his site and a leave a favorable comment.</p>
<p>Sure, he could &#8220;bribe&#8221; them with an offer. But that sort of takes away from it being an voluntary review. Sounds like paying people &#8212; and would deserve a Google Slap, imo. I think it makes more sense to just constantly give a lot, so that when you ask for a favour like this, the readers (or listeners or viewers &#8212; depending on your medium) are happy to respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. A. Manley</title>
		<link>http://marketersboard.com/google-search-wiki-worth/comment-page-1/#comment-4550</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. A. Manley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketersboard.com/?p=146#comment-4550</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sylvie. Great video review. Never even heard of this.

I could see this being valuable in the case of where one has a loyal following. For example, one of my alt. health clients has a big following loyal readers who keep up with his daily blog posts. I think he could just go ahead and ask them to log into Google,  promote his site and a leave a favorable comment.

Sure, he could &quot;bribe&quot; them with an offer. But that sort of takes away from it being an voluntary review. Sounds like paying people -- and would deserve a Google Slap, imo. I think it makes more sense to just constantly give a lot, so that when you ask for a favour like this, the readers (or listeners or viewers -- depending on your medium) are happy to respond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sylvie. Great video review. Never even heard of this.</p>
<p>I could see this being valuable in the case of where one has a loyal following. For example, one of my alt. health clients has a big following loyal readers who keep up with his daily blog posts. I think he could just go ahead and ask them to log into Google,  promote his site and a leave a favorable comment.</p>
<p>Sure, he could &#8220;bribe&#8221; them with an offer. But that sort of takes away from it being an voluntary review. Sounds like paying people &#8212; and would deserve a Google Slap, imo. I think it makes more sense to just constantly give a lot, so that when you ask for a favour like this, the readers (or listeners or viewers &#8212; depending on your medium) are happy to respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

